Nuclear time wemake peace with islam
![nuclear time wemake peace with islam nuclear time wemake peace with islam](https://destroyislamnow.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/pakistan-85-390x285.jpg)
Islamic State's only constant maxim is the expansion of power at any price." In the words of Der Spiegel journalist Christoph Reuter, whose revelatory study of IS is required reading: "There is essentially nothing religious in its actions, its strategic planning, its unscrupulous changing of alliances and its precisely implemented propaganda narratives.įaith, even in its extreme form, is just one of many means to an end. Christoph Reuter, Der Spiegel journalist Islamic State's only constant maxim is the expansion of power at any price' 'Faith, even in its extreme form, is just one of many means to an end. This background explains why experts have estimated that one-third of IS commanders were former Baathist soldiers.Įxperts say that Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi's two principal lieutenants are Iyad al-Obaidi and Ayad al-Jumaili - former Iraqi army officers under Saddam.Īs far as these commanders are concerned, Islamic State is a Baathist renaissance project, a secular enterprise aimed at winning back the status and power of which they were stripped in 2003. Many of its future leaders were held in Abu Ghraib and Camp Bucca prison camps, where they established the contacts and evolved the strategy of conquest that exploded across the Middle East a few years later. Although Zarqawi was killed by a US air strike in 2006, his bloodthirsty organisation swiftly evolved into the Islamic State we know today. Stripped of their livelihood, many subsequently turned into bitter enemies of the United States and the new regime in Baghdad.Ī British soldier watches oil wells burn in southern Iraq in 2003 (AFP)These fighters entered into an alliance with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Salafi jihadist and leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Saddam Hussein's Baathist army was disbanded by the Coalition, but its warriors did not disappear. The spark for the group's creation was the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and its brutal aftermath. The first problem is Holland's account of the origins of IS, for which he ignores the two most important facts. However, the arguments he makes in his film are intellectually dishonest. He fails to include information which does not fit his thesis and, just as bad, distorts facts which appear to support it. It would have been insensitive to discuss at that time and better to wait until time had passed.) Baathist origins of IS I delayed this article because of the atrocities in Manchester and London during the general election campaign, and then the attack on Finsbury Park Mosque. (The film was broadcast on Channel 4 to acclaim on 17 May. This is why I believe that a sceptical analysis of the claims made in Isis: The Origins of Violence is needed.
#Nuclear time wemake peace with islam tv
We have often heard variations of this thesis - that Islam and Western liberal civilisation cannot coexist - from the English Defence League, Donald Trump's ideologists, neoconservative think tanks, tabloid newspapers and far-right parties in continental Europe.īut it's less common from one of our more admired public intellectuals, amplified on what appears to be quite an expensive Channel 4 TV production.
![nuclear time wemake peace with islam nuclear time wemake peace with islam](https://i.redd.it/rw9uk4s9gpw01.jpg)
On the basis of these arguments, Holland implicitly demands that Islam itself should reform. Isis: The Origins of Violence Read More » Holland compares verses and stories told about the Prophet as "mines waiting to go off, improvised explosives, and they can lie there for maybe centuries and something happens to trigger them, and you get this". He uses the Prophet Muhammad himself, who is regarded by all Muslims as the perfect human being, to help explain the genocidal violence of IS in the 21st century. He also links IS to texts from the Quran and states that IS atrocities are directly inspired by the teachings of Islamic holy scripture. He thus connects IS to Sunni Islam's most distinctive political institution, the Caliphate. Holland suggests, for example, that the Ottoman army which captured Constantinople in 1453 was a precursor to IS. It argues that the extreme violence of self-proclaimed IS should be interpreted in significant ways as a manifestation of Islam itself. However, the arguments he makes in his film are intellectually dishonest This makes him a national treasure.īut I am baffled by his recent documentary about Islamic State (IS), Isis: The Origins of Violence.
![nuclear time wemake peace with islam nuclear time wemake peace with islam](https://www.lightmillennium.org/3rd_april_03/image/picasso_acrobats_m.jpg)
Unlike most historians, Tom Holland writes books which bring the past to life.